About your Search

20121101
20121130
Search Results 0 to 17 of about 18 (some duplicates have been removed)
was asked about susan rice being the person that went out on point, on that sunday following the attacks. why the ambassador from the united nations would be the person, not the director of national intelligence, not the cia director, not the national security director. the secretary safety or the vice-president, but the u.n. ambassador and when asked and challenged about her testimony, this is what the president said and then i'm going to get your reaction to it. >> if senator mccain and senator graham and others want to go after somebody, they should go after me, but for them to go after the u.n. ambassador who had nothing to do with benghazi, and was simply making a presentation based on intelligence that she had received, and to besmirch her reputation is outrageous. >> mike: now, to quote shakespeare, me thinks the man doth protest too much. and to me a legitimate question and then go after senators graham and mccain. >> a little paternalistic and left out one of the senators, a senator kelly ayotte who happens to be a female and i find it instructive that he left her out of his cri
that information, susan rice either didn't have it or use it when she went on the talk shows sunday. >> mike: one of the questions is, who is the they? are we closer to knowing that? did this go to the white house? was this done within the internal operations of the cia, at the state department? did you -- can you give us insight as to who it was who authorized and put their hands to the document and said we've got to scratch this out? >> no, sir we can't that. is a subtragedy to a larger tragedy that government can scrub out salient relevant information and we are no closer to knowing who did it and why. i suspect we know why. we are no closer to knowing who. i would say we've had two hearings now, one closed and one open. we have only just begun. i understand the need to have closed door hearings for classified information. but this is the same administration that wants to try terrorists in open court, with full discovery in front of the media in new york city. we are going to have open hearings as soon as we get back as soon as the new congress is convened. we are going to have open hearings t
ambassador susan rice out there telling cbs that they didn't have enough information to know since then, there are leaks and cables and e-mails that show within hours after the attack, the administration knew that the islamic militant group claimed responsibility for it but that was not mentioned and so there are so many questions to be ask and stow many people who know thing that is they need to tell us. the intelligence committee is able to get information that other committees don't have acess tompt and the administration has to be straight up with us. they don't have an excuse for not telling us the truth. >> yoed hillary clinton secretary of state, will she be call tod testify and will she do so? >> she may be called by another committee. technically her department is not under our jurisdiction. we are the intelligence committee strictly. i would assume other committees might call her. what she will do. i don't know. it is an unfortunate swadings that we are looking at now. the timing of the resignation is for curious and we have to get to the bottom of it and find out the truth of
.n. ambassador, susan rice was out there telling cbs that you know, they didn't have enough information to know. and so, since then there have been leaked state department cables and e-mails that show within hours after the attack, the administration knew that ansar al sharia, a militant group claimed responsibility. all of that was not mentioned so there are just so many questions to be asked and many people who know things that they need to tell us. you know, the intelligence committee is able to get information that other committees don't have access to. so, the administration has to be straight up with us. they don't have an excuse for trying not to tell us the truth. >> mike: you mentioned hillary clinton, secretary of state. do you expect she would be called to testify and would you expect her to do so. >> she may be called by another committee. technically her department is not under our jurisdiction in the intelligence community. we're the intelligence community strictly, but i assume that other committees may call her. as to what she will do, i don't know. again, you can subpoena peopl
Search Results 0 to 17 of about 18 (some duplicates have been removed)